|
|
|
|
|
by PhantomGremlin
4226 days ago
|
|
I don't know the background of this fight. But I did read the linked buzzfeed article. The article discusses remarks Uber executive Emil Michael made. He said that Uber should consider hiring a team of opposition researchers to dig up dirt on its critics in the media — and specifically to spread details of the personal life of a female journalist who has criticized the company. The executive later attempted to repudiate his remarks by saying “The remarks attributed to me at a private
dinner — borne out of frustration during an
informal debate over what I feel is
sensationalistic media coverage of the
company I am proud to work for — do not
reflect my actual views and have no relation
to the company’s views or approach. They were
wrong no matter the circumstance and
I regret them.”
So apparently the words coming out of his mouth did not reflect his "actual views". Good to know.Kinda reminds me of an earlier period of US history, when a US President nicknamed Tricky Dick famously said: "We can do that, but it would be wrong." History does not record whether Dick was winking when he said that. |
|
It's unfortunate that we have little way to tell. Now it's "trial by media" and we can't even fully trust anyone who was present at the moment of utterance.