Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by a3_nm 4232 days ago
Certainly this is what will happen if everyone thinks the same way as you...

(I have been my own SMTP server (hosted by OVH) for a few months now. I was blocked exactly once, by custom filtering from a small provider where the delivery status notification said to appeal to abuse@, I emailed them and they fixed it in minutes.)
2 comments
jimktrains2 4232 days ago
> Certainly this is what will happen if everyone thinks the same way as you...

What will happen? More people will block small providers because fewer exists? The issue is much larger than that. There need to be better ways to deal with email than just dropping it for arbitrary reasons.

> I was blocked exactly once

... that you know of

I've worked for companies where our internal mail servers just couldn't email some people; we presume their ISP black listed us and never published it on a shared list. (We only know this because people would call because they never got the email with the link to their purchased item.)

I do not have the time to worry about if every email I send will get delivered. Many systems don't send you a status notification; they just accept and then drop the message, meaning you may not see an error in the logs. You may not show up on public black lists for days. That's not something I want to be sinking my time into. I'd rather pay someone to run a well-known service that is very unlikely to have delivery issues.

link
a3_nm 4232 days ago
Pretending to accept an email and then dropping just seems wrong. Is this something that reputable email providers do?

(From my experience, I have never witnessed a situation where an email I had sent to someone had silently been ignored.)

link
jimktrains2 4232 days ago
Yes, it is a practice that big players do.

http://serverfault.com/questions/364132/postfix-says-mail-se...

link
a3_nm 4232 days ago
My understanding of this answer is that the SMTP said it had accepted it, but the sender would have been notified afterwards that the message had not been delivered, had the return addresses correctly been set up. This seems OK to me; I would have received the bounce.

(Also, the mail was sent from www-data, which I think was an acceptable clue to classify the message as spam no matter from which server it came from.)

link
jimktrains2 4232 days ago
It doesn't always need to send a bounce if it doesn't want to.
link
tedunangst 4232 days ago
Similar story. I couldn't email msn (or exchange, etc.) but there was a web form I could fill out. Annoying, but I got to have some fun describing the type of emails I sent to my "list" and its "unsubscribe process".
link