[dkopi]

"if american companies agreed with american government" Just as a reminder, The government threatened to fine Yahoo $250,000 a day if it did not immediately cave in and comply with the secret court order. http://www.wired.com/2014/09/feds-yahoo-fine-prism/

This blog post could actually be Google's way of silently signaling us that the US gov't is still strong arming american companies, and it needs the help of public pressure in order to keep our information safe and secure.

[mhurron]

> could actually be Google's way of silently signaling us that the US gov't is still strong arming american companies

Or it could be Googles way of looking like a good guy without actually doing anything. How you look at it depends on how much you want to trust them, or any other company that does something similar.

Personally I will never ascribe good intentions to any amoral entity. Google is going to do like every other business will do, what ever it takes to increase the bottom line.

[k-mcgrady]

>> "The government threatened to fine Yahoo $250,000 a day if it did not immediately cave in and comply with the secret court order."

Do you think that really would have happened if the CEO or a high ranking employee came out publicly and explained what was happening? There is no way the fines would have happened or anyone would have been prosecuted. Sure the USG could have done it but they would have been insane to.

[mudetroit]

Be very careful thinking that they would not have attempted to prosecute them and/or punish the company for doing so. The wonderful fun of these secret courts, that we are stuck with for the moment, is that everything the do is stuck under gag order. You have to deal with the prospect of an angry judge or prosecutor at that point, and don't discount the likelihood of them being vindictive.

[drjesusphd]

> The government threatened to fine Yahoo $250,000 a day

That had to have been a bluff. There's no way to hide that kind of money from the balance sheet of a public company.