|
|
|
|
|
by serve_yay
4235 days ago
|
|
If places sold an empty bottle for 5c or whatever that you had to fill up by yourself at a tap, then that's what I would buy. Sometimes you're out and you want something to drink but you don't have a container, bottled water is kind of an obvious choice. All the purity shit is just capitalist competition in action. And I still don't understand what is worse about it than bottled Coke or whatever. |
|
Contra the article, I would argue that there's three reasons bottled water became popular:
1) Convenience: no need to tote an empty container around with you, or find one when you're thirsty
2) Status signaling: a.k.a. "tap water is what the proles drink"
3) Collapse of faith in the efficacy of collective action: the rise of Perrier was driven by sales in the US & UK, and occurred during the late '70s and early '80s, the same time as the rise of Reagan and Thatcher and the beginning of the era we live in now. Guarantees of the purity of tap water rested on the authority of government, which people had stopped believing in. The purity of bottled water rested on the authority of the Free Marketâ„¢, which was more in fashion.
Empty bottle plus tap would be much better for the environment, and probably cost people less over time than bottled water does, but it fails in comparison on all three of those points. And since history shows these are the points people care about, the prospects of the concept don't seem bright; at least not without another major shift in society.