Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by diminoten 4244 days ago
The US doesn't engage in economic espionage, and then turn around and give/sell intellectual property to US companies.
2 comments

In fact their pals at CSEC were found to be doing exactly that. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/brazil-spying-repo...
Which private US company received this information in an attempt to boost that company's economic power?

I can't find that information in the article.

There are several mentions of this in the Snowden papers. I think the most well known is Boeing, in their dealings against Airbus.
That's not in the Snowden papers, and the actual source for that is highly suspect.

I forget the name of that project, but the Wikipedia page's reference are all terrible. Not a single one stands up to scrutiny.

How are you sure of this? I wouldn't be.

And you're saying it's somehow a different class of ethical conundrum to engage in espionage to kill people, or to engage in it for economic advantage, and killing people is more ethical?

I am not surprised the state-capitalist Chinese see it differently, and are okay with both.

I'm about as sure of this as I am of unicorns not existing.

As to the ethical dilemma, I'm only noting a difference.

Brazil is less sure. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/09/nsa-spying-braz...

The NYT says it's a "fine line"

> But the government does not deny it routinely spies to advance American economic advantage, which is part of its broad definition of how it protects American national security. In short, the officials say, while the N.S.A. cannot spy on Airbus and give the results to Boeing, it is free to spy on European or Asian trade negotiators and use the results to help American trade officials — and, by extension, the American industries and workers they are trying to bolster.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/21/business/us-snooping-on-co...

That's an editorial, so it's the view of one guy who works at the NYT, and not an all-that-well backed up view, to boot.

And I think fine lines are important lines.