|
|
|
|
|
by bstrand
4237 days ago
|
|
Good question. It probably is not relevant. I presume it's predicated on the notion that olds are generally less tech savvy (and therefore less capable of fairly & reasonably adjudicating technology cases.) Sarah Jeong has written thoughtfully on whether justices need be tech savvy:
http://sarahjeong.net/2014/04/23/scotus-is-bad-at-computers-... |
|