|
|
|
|
|
by Recoil42
4238 days ago
|
|
It's a bit misleading of a conclusion to make, because most of those changes likely aren't non-compatible changes. For instance, maybe a chip goes out of manufacturing, and they can no longer get it supplied, but a successor product from the same supplier meets all the same requirements. Perhaps a bracket goes out of manufacture, but an almost identical bracket is sourced from a different supplier. This would qualify as a hardware modification, but is a non-breaking change. |
|
A good example is the company that changed the design of their guard-rail endcaps. They reduced the size by an inch, which allegedly resulted in 5 deaths (court cases are ongoing). They (again, allegedly) failed to test the change, and failed to report the design change to NHTSA and the various state highway departments that specified it's use.
Another example is the ignition switch in GM cars. The engineer changed the design, but did not issue a new part number for it. Externally, same shape & mounting points & connector pinouts. Internally, very different.
So while a design change in a part might be "like for like", it requires a full lifecycle of testing and documentation. And that's expensive, so auto makers try very hard to get their designs correct up front.