|
|
|
|
|
by siganakis
4241 days ago
|
|
We (msgooroo.com) use the .Net stack on Azure and have found it to be quite good. We have even been experimenting with the new vNext / OWIN stack which appears even better and will give us the flexibility to run on Linux. Azure is a bit hit and miss. Its brilliant for getting something up an running quickly (using websites / SQL Server), but is a little flaky at scale. Key problems include connection issues with SQL Server, connection issues with their hosted Redis service, pricing of SQL Server when using advanced features like geo-replication. All in all though, its a pretty good development experience once you get your head around the fact that in the cloud services fail and there is nothing you can do about it except plan for it. Oh and the Bizspark program they have gives you $100 worth of free hosting on Azure which is always nice. |
|
What sort? If it's intermediate connection problems .NET 4.5.1 added Connection Resiliency to ADO.NET [1]. If you're using a recent enough version of Entity Framework it goes even further [2].
[1] http://dpaoliello.wordpress.com/2014/03/30/connection-resili...
[2] http://thedatafarm.com/data-access/ef6-connection-resiliency...