Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by drdaeman 4243 days ago
For local networking, packet loss is, in most cases, a sign something somewhere isn't doing well. So, maybe, it's better notice it sooner than bump into possible unexpected problems later.
2 comments

I think for things like WiFi networks this could help immensely.

Extremely long tail latencies are observed which reach a second or more in those networks when some interference causes loss.

It would be much better to react quicker than the eternity of 200ms (if that is the default).

Not really. A busy network has a million little buffers and things where your packet might get dropped but succeed 1ms later.
But those buffers are also often huge and your packet could still come out the other end of one of them 20ms (or 2s, if it's a cable or DSL modem) later. You still want to treat it as evidence of congestion, though.