|
|
|
|
|
by kens
4247 days ago
|
|
I read the claims, and this patent really is as stupid as described - filming a yoga class from the back. The only thing of interest in the claims is having a "corridor" without students so they don't block the view of the teacher. Prior art is basically anyone who ever said "Can you guys move out of the way?" Edit: The patent has a flowchart, which looks like a satire of patent flowcharts. It's a two-page flowchart of how to film a yoga class with silly steps like "Students arrive and set up their yoga mats", "Loaded into video editing software". It doesn't even make sense as a sequence of steps. This is a much worse patent than the Amazon "white background" patent which at least describes a few things that aren't totally obvious to me, such as the positions and brightness of the lights and the choice of lens. (These things may be obvious to a skilled practitioner, though.) Yoga patent: https://www.google.com/patents/US8605152 White background patent: https://www.google.com/patents/US8676045 |
|
It is possible that their specific claims relate to some of their very specific ratios and distances, but it seems like a stretch to me.