|
|
|
|
|
by olavk
4245 days ago
|
|
Terseness at different levels. Avoiding boilerplate syntax is good. Obscure abbreviated names of functions and operators just to save a few keystrokes is bad. Btw. the definition of terseness in the essay seem specifically chosen to favor Lisp style languages. 2 + 3 * 4 is clearly terser than (+ 2 (* 3 4)) But by counting "leafs" like he does (rather than say tokens), they get the same terseness-count. |
|