|
|
|
|
|
by Shivetya
4251 days ago
|
|
but in the end you are not punishing the bank, it merely is an entity with no physical means of being punished. To punish it you need to throw their boards into jail. Fines are paid by share holders if any, hence is the bank punished? Not unless depositors leave in droves. You cannot fine a bank for its holdings as those are the funds and properties of other people, the bank is merely managing money for others. if you attempt to dissolve a bank, who takes over the loans, how do you get the depositor funds back. You cannot confiscate them in the names of the state, the distress to the economy would be drastic. In the end its back to the people running the show, put them in jail, or force them out, or fine them, or all of the above. However like politicians there are so many levels here than they are nearly immune to their actions TL;DR Monetary fines are irrelevant, punishing the people who run it is the only means to correct future behavior |
|
If government took actions to pull all revenue (plus some) generated by these schemes it could go a long way in changing the culture. It appears to me, and probably many others, that the punishment imposed (fines) are simply a cost doing business as the banks appear to still be making profits, or at the very least keeping large portions of revenue, off of illegal activity.
There is no simple solution, and this might be the wrong one, but the current solution doesn't appear to be working.