[ThatGeoGuy]

Probably an obvious error, but on page 81 (second page), they say the following:

    Another correct test case is as follows:
    > (rat (float -1 23 -6))
    - (26) / (34)

In truth, this should be - 23 / 64, which is a very different number. Perhaps there's comical value in an article about accurate math having inaccurate typography?

[ntoronto]

That is indeed a typo. Thanks for catching it.

It's amazing how much you miss when you think you already know what's written.