Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sandycheeks 4252 days ago
If they gave over a third ownership to EFF things would become interesting. Don't see it happening though.
1 comments

Under 2/3rds I wonder what would be best long term? A founder owning at least a third could be a problem if when they died, those shares went to someone who was more interested in profit than stated goals. Maybe to get access to the social network you have to buy a share? Spread out the shares to enough individuals and put in language to prevent proxy voting and require a minimum percentage of share holders to vote to change those stated goals?