|
|
|
|
|
by gmantastic
4259 days ago
|
|
> What do you think would be a good set of criteria for what should count as a meaningful unit of work? I'd consider a meaningful unit of work to be a bug fixed, or feature implemented, at least to the extent that you have a runnable version of the code again (even if you intend to do further work to implement it better e.g. replacing hard-coding). I'd consider changes short of this as not worth commiting, as this would not be a good starting point for further work (I know it's cheap to branch with Git etc., but it just feels untidy to leave something so part-done). |
|