|
|
|
|
|
by 4ad
4263 days ago
|
|
The argument presented is very weak. Yes, the service file is smaller and simpler, but I actually understand perfectly the init file, whereas to understand how systemd processes the service file I'd have to actually read all of systemd's source code. Programs have many bugs. I'd rather debug that shell script than debug systemd. |
|
The shell script approach violates the DRY principle--it's probably super similar to some 50 other init scripts on the same system. systemd, in principle, removes the boilerplate so that the bug would only have to be fixed once.