[pqs]

That would be valid if customers had to use the App! If it was compulsory. But, people only use the Apps they want to, the ones they download! So, if you don't like the counter, just don't download it.

There must be a way to stop this rejection-crazyness.

[GHFigs]

So, if you don't like the counter, just don't download it.

You cannot count on people behaving this way, least of all when it comes to politics.

There must be a way to stop this rejection-crazyness.

Broad rejection under the banner of "politically charged" is probably the most sane solution for Apple. The more they permit, the greater the backlash over any particular rejection, and the more their permission would be construed as endorsement.

For instance, suppose a pro-life and pro-choice application are both approved for the store, but one (it doesn't matter which) is only approved with a higher age limitation than the other due to content. Even if Apple's rating approval were completely consistent with other applications, the discrepancy between these two is practically guaranteed to cause a shitstorm. Multiply that by every other axis of approval or rejection and every other political issue in every country Apple runs a store.

[pqs]

What I cannot understand at all is why I'm able to install any kind of software on my mackbook and why I can't do this on my iPhone. It's just absurd.

[pistoriusp]

Never underestimate how often people will find reasons to be offended:

Drive down a road... See a billboard that you don't agree with... Offended!

The "fk Jesus" group on Facebook... Offended!

I usually only tend to get offended when someone is trying to offend me directly. But other people are not so liberal with their egos.

[pqs]

But this is their problem. I should be able to use any kind of software in my iPhone.