[Karunamon]

It doesn't even need to be a false flag. All it takes is one un-hinged idiot who thinks they're Doing The Right Thing, and by the standards that HN users apparently have, that's enough to discard the entire movement. Because, yknow, a group's most unhinged members only stand for the movement when it's GG, even when those members are denounced by everyone else, but that same standard doesn't apply to people on the other side because reasons.

You'll pardon me for refusing to take this kind of lazy, hypocritical, dishonest viewpoint seriously.

I fully expect this post to receive un-rebutted downvotes, too.

[mcherm]

You write (sarcastically): > a group's most unhinged members only stand for the movement when it's GG, even when those members are denounced by everyone else

I have missed the part where those members sending threats were "denounced by everyone else". (Certainly they have been denounced by a few.) Where are you seeing that?

[_wdh]

By that logic, you can't judge any group in any way for doing anything because anything anyone does can be reduced to being an "un-hinged idiot".

[Karunamon]

Not at all. I can show you on pretty much every organizing point for GamerGate where there are rules in place about sexist or nasty comments, where people have been massively reported for trying to organize an invasion (on a chan board no less!) and so on.

Those leading the outrage train against gamergate are doing a fantastic job of cherry picking while ignoring this larger trend.

And by the way, lest you think that the concerns about "false flags" are just paranoid rantings, it is a thing that has happened before.

[1] http://gamergate.giz.moe/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/faking-h...