|
|
|
|
|
by limpon
4261 days ago
|
|
1. Ebola's rate of infection is ~1.5 - 2 new infections per infected persons [1] Even though this is an exponential rate, it does nowhere get near the rates of many other viruses. As such it is easier to restrict further infections than it is for most other infectious diseases. 2. The 1.4M people prediction from the CDS assumed no intervention or help from other countries and a collapse of the local healthcare systems. That's why I am saying that we should focus our efforts on helping the healthcare workers in West Africa. > Who knows what the infection rate will be outside of West Africa
Way lower than the rate in West Africa, that is for sure. Ebola doesn't spread through the air, you have to get in direct contact with body fluids. You don't get infected by sitting in a bus or plane with someone, who is infected. Most of the infected people are healthworkers in a setting without protective clothing, even gloves are rare to come by.
Others are direct relatives who don't know much about ebola and who have burial rituals that are very different to the ones most of us are used to. It is very common in West Africa to wash out the mouth of dead persons and to kiss them goodbye. I am pretty sure this would not happen in the US or Europe, especially not if the deceased person died by bleeding out of all body openings. A very large majority of ebola infected people in West Africa can't go to a hospital - there are no free beds at the moment. So they go back home to their families. THIS is how ebola spreads. That's why we have to act, but not by panicking, but rather by sending well trained medical staff to help. [1] http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1411100#t=article |
|