|
|
|
|
|
|
by bd_at_rivenhill
4271 days ago
|
|
|
Seems like it should be possible for the defense to argue that the prosecution must stipulate that the server was his property, in which case his rights were violated, or that the prosecution must stipulate that it was not his property and that they have no case against him. What is wrong with this argument in a legal sense? |
|
|