|
|
|
|
|
by regularfry
4268 days ago
|
|
> you say "10 5% improvements of state S0" in that sentence and then later on you use 10 5% improvements of state S0, S1... S9. No, I don't. Here's a very simplistic example. Say I've got a complicated computation with 10 nested loops, and there's a potential for a 5% speedup tweak at every nesting level, each of which takes about the same amount of effort to find; or, for the same overall effort I can speed up the whole thing by 50% by replacing the whole algorithm with a faster one. The former case gives you a better outcome than the latter, and it doesn't matter what order you do the tweaks in, or whether you do them all at once. The point is that they can compound without caring about the previous or latter state of anything other than their own level. |
|