|
|
|
|
|
|
by andybak
4271 days ago
|
|
|
I think there is a similar flaw in your argument as follows. You: OO is flawed because of x Me: But OO language a doesn't have a problem with x You: Ah but language a has problems with y Me: Yes but language b doesn't etc... You conclude OO is inherently flawed I conclude that there are now languages without flaws... |
|
|
On the other hand, if you say "I'm trying to do X - what's a good language to use?" then we can have a conversation. Some of the flaws are irrelevant in some projects, but roadblocks in others.
Debating the pros and cons of languages without the context of a project is like discussing the best form of transport without having any idea of the journey.