Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by throwawayornot 4268 days ago
"yishan 27 points 15 minutes ago Hiya. It was a harsh response, I agree (there's actually more, but we're pulling our punches, if you can believe it), and in fact all day yesterday I didn't want to post a reply, hoping his AMA wouldn't get too much traction or he wouldn't spout too many misconceptions and we could all just continue going our separate ways. Problem is, this was starting to really irritate a number of employees who'd worked with him, and he's the kind of guy who enjoys the attention he can get by saying "I used to be a reddit admin" even though he'll just post spurious stuff he doesn't know about, and left unchecked the positive attention encourages him to do it more. In running reddit, there's an interesting balance between the normal standards of professionalism (which we try very hard to uphold even when someone is being unreasonable) and the fact that we're a huge internet forum where a higher degree of openness is expected. I'm actually really focused on building competent, professional management precisely because the spotlight is always on us - and also because I've been at other Silicon Valley companies where that hasn't always been the case - but it also means that because of that spotlight, any tiny deviation can be hugely magnified."[1]

[1] https://np.reddit.com/r/RedditCensorship/comments/2ifd3p/ude...

1 comments

TL;DR: "We got antsy; we didn't know what to do; so we retaliated."
That is not a tldr. That's your interpretation.
That's the point of TLDR'ing: what they said was so muddled (or evasive) that we're forced to draw an interpretation.
The point of TL;DR is to summarize a longer piece. It literally means “Too long; didn't read”
I don't think you can summarize without first interpreting.
No, you totally can. You just repeat the main arguments of the author without injecting any of your own opinions.
Quick! Fire from the hips...