|
|
|
|
|
by pollockgf
4279 days ago
|
|
You're both right, and that's what is holding DevOps back. From a prescriptive view of language, "DevOps" has the meaning that early leaders like Gene Kim gave it: a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement that combines dev and ops teams. From a descriptive view of language, LOTS of people, and not just recruiters, use it to mean a special group of people who are essentially release managers. Is DevOps the union or intersection of dev and ops? It really depends on what you want it to mean. And that is...not useful. |
|
In reality, if you look at the history of the term and the current leadership of the development and discussion around DevOps, it still represents the following core areas: 3rd Order Cybernetics, Agile (Infrastructure + Software Development) and Continuous Delivery. I personally believe it's just a simpler way to refer to 3rd Order Cybernetics (3OC will never catch on) and DevOps the term will give way to something that better fits the nature of the movement, but until then, that's what DevOps is. I agree there's a lot of noise and confusion, but that hasn't erased the history, the progress or the true current state.