|
|
|
|
|
by freyrs3
4280 days ago
|
|
The complaints in the article don't really generalize at all. It seems to just be a rant about why targeting the JVM from a functional language can yield non optimal code without certain program transformations. Haskell and OCaml don't have the problems mentioned here at all. I wish the title actually reflected the content rather than just being kind of antagonistic about functional programming. |
|