|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
4274 days ago
|
|
> If you were stranded in the wilderness and needed to survive from scratch, would you rather be with a group of attractive people or a group of smart people? The naively obvious answer is "smart", but given that what people have evolved to find attractive in general (before distortions from makeup, etc., designed to fool natural attraction) is somewhat tied to health and physical fitness,
and ability to contribute in a survival situation is very much affected by that as well as smarts, then if those are the only two measures available, there's reason to at least seek some balance between then rather than purely favoring smarts. |
|
Fitness is related to, but not the same as, attractiveness.
Of course it's possible to imagine a scenario of puny or fat nerds vs gorgeous athletes, but that's adding in things that don't necessarily relate and it's pretty clearly avoiding the intent of the scenario.