Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ck2 4284 days ago
Not really. Go back and look on archive.org, I had 6 in January and it is just 2 now.

Submissions get buried quickly now because of the sheer volume.

Points are silly though. People who join today are never, ever going to catch up to someone who joined five years ago.

1 comments

> I had 6 in January and it is just 2 now.

I'm fairly certain they changed the ranking algorithm for comments around April/May. My average used to be 10 (it's 4.5 now), and this meant that I could comment on a thread and it would essentially always be the top comment, even if it only had 1 point and the comments below had more.

This created a positive feedback loop - because the top comments get read more, they also get voted up more (as long as they're not blatant trolls/spam). So once you had an average of about 6 or more, it was very easy to maintain and rack up points.

They seem to have changed the algorithm them - I remember when they did it, because I noticed the effects almost immediately (not just on my own account, but on others' accounts, like tptacek and tokenadult).

Overall, this is probably a change for the better, since it mitigates the "rich get richer" effect of commenting frequently while still rewarding people who consistently contribute valuable comments.

That's right.