| It may be cultural, but I think it boils down to corporatism. In a traditional job, there's no subjectivity in what you're paid. You have a rate or a salary and are paid according to that. It's pretty straight-forward. With Soothe or any tip-driven service (in the US, that includes waiting tables, cab driving, barbers, and a host of other service jobs), there's a significant amount of subjectivity that determines your income. If you do well, you're tipped well. On just a regular $50 dinner here in the States, I can tip anywhere from $5 to $15 depending on how satisfied I am with the waitress' service. But what if the restaurant took responsibility for the waitress' tips? It wants to maximize its profits. Chances are it's not going to pay $15 or even $10 for each table...it's going to pay a lot less. How much less? I contend it will pay the least it can before it starts running into talent problems. That rate, whatever it is, assuming the waitress is good, MUST be less than the average customer would pay in tips. The restaurant sees all its waitresses as good, so it can't pay any one more than the other. That would be unfair and illegal. Customers can. And they would pay more for good service. That's why, I think, on average, at least here in the States, a tipped employee does worse when working for a company like Soothe. I'd love to see a study on this topic for Uber et al to see what's really happening. |