|
|
|
|
|
by tP5n
4279 days ago
|
|
He's right, eventhough there have been other groups pushing biblical literalism in history. Think about it, for a long time the predominant biblical scholarship was catholic biblical criticism, whose point is viewing biblical texts as having human origins. Also remember that Protestantisms critique on the catholic church was that it was too literal in its take on biblical texts, that transubstantiation for example (this is my actual body; this is my actual blood) didn't exist. And regarding this thread: at least, please stop attempting to do biblical literalism in english. those are not your holy words. |
|