|
|
|
|
|
by jude-
4284 days ago
|
|
What mystifies me in these systemd discussions is that systemd proponents always seem to think that "modular" is somehow the opposite of "monolithic," when it is entirely possible for a system to be both. "Modular" only means that a system is factored into components that address logically separate concerns. "Monolithic" means that your modules are tightly coupled. For example, the Linux kernel and X.org are both modular and monolithic, as is systemd. Coreutils, by contrast, is modular and NOT monolithic. |
|
By your line of reasoning, the GNU Hurd is a monolithic OS, because most Hurd servers live in the same source tree and send messages to each other at runtime.