Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Duhck 4289 days ago
We had the same problem. We actually wanted to use Heroku just for pre-production as it was the easiest to deploy / manage, but their TCP socket implementation is such a joke.

We would up just using AWS, and sunk a few days into dev / sys ops.

I would happily pay for a solution to this problem

1 comments

Could you elaborate a bit on "their TCP socket implementation is such a joke" ? Are you talking about the Ruppell's Sockets addon ? What's your problem with it ? What could be an improvement to it ?
I've also evaluated Heroku and the Ruppell's Sockets, so I can answer this from my point of view. The problem is that it's a workaround solution - all TCP traffic goes through an external server, which is unacceptable for any serious use case. How secure is that external server? What if it goes down? There isn't really anything that can be improved, other than Heroku natively supporting TCP sockets.