[nailer]

> The author of this piece makes the classic mistake of equating the init system as the process manager and process supervisor. > To stuff everything in the init system, I'd argue, is bad design.

The author is not making any mistake at all, or no more so than you are.

I'm sure you both value engineering principles like separation of concerns and a single source of truth.

The author believes that by removing the redundancy between initd / xinetd / supervisord / syslog the system is improved.

You disagree, and believe that these are separate concerns.

That's fine, you have different values / judgements in this matter. But saying he's `mistaken` for not agreeing with you is childish.