[sat]

Here is a competition. I'd write in Java and you can write in go. Lets crank out a simple ToDo CRUD application. Any bet who will finish faster?

This is not to say go is bad at all. Its been designed by people 1000x smarter than me. But it isn't helping small shops go any faster or be more productive than they are with current setup. Talk about progress of the 21st century programming language...can't find much.

[smegel]

> Lets crank out a simple ToDo CRUD application. Any bet who will finish faster?

Well I haven't done much web programming in Go, so I would not be very fast. I have done a lot in Python, and I usually finish prototype apps within days while the Java teams are still stuck in meetings with the Oracle DBAs trying to work out why Hibernate is generating shitty SQL again. And I believe Go is comparable to Python as far as productivity is concerned, but with type-safety and speed.

I think there is a lot to commend of Java, well at least the JVM, and the tooling and libraries are great, as is the performance. But I rarely hear anyone argue it is a fast, agile language to develop in.

[sat]

Well, I was just comparing Java - a complied, strictly typed languages to another in the same domain - Go. Scripting and interpreted languages like python, ruby are a different thing altogether. I agree with you that ruby/rails or python/django get it done a lot faster. On the JVM, we get close but not quite - with Grails and Play. Spring Boot seems to be getting up there as well in terms of productivity. They still have some way to go.

[vorg]

> Scripting and interpreted languages like python, ruby are a different thing altogether. I agree with you that ruby/rails or python/django get it done a lot faster. On the JVM, we get close but not quite - with Grails and Play

Play doesn't use a scripting/interpreted language, it uses Scala, a statically-typed one, but with type inference which you may have confused with dynamicity. As for Groovy/Grails, they seem to be dying off lately.