|
|
|
|
|
by rahimnathwani
4291 days ago
|
|
Let me be more clear. You said: 'can you point out taxpayer money they were "given"' My point is that the subsidised interest rate _is_ taxpayer money they were given. They were given the difference between the market interest and the interest they actually paid. I'm _not_ arguing either that (i) 'the US is an efficient pure market' or (ii) that this specific subsidy was a good or bad thing. |
|