|
|
|
|
|
by Jedd
4290 days ago
|
|
Certain uneducated users of the language may have 'moved on'. Doesn't mean the rest of us should encourage this misuse. The word devastate much better suits the intent here, which would leave decimate to continue meaning something quite specific (and useful). |
|
I find it much more convenient, and useful, to have a word that means the current modern definition of decimate. Perhaps decimate is a poor choice to represent that, but honestly not every word has to sound or have roots that directly relate to the definition of the word. It is more important words are used, rather than languish or die in history books.