|
|
|
|
|
by PinguTS
4290 days ago
|
|
Actually, they where never banned as such and this decision is not a decision in the case, but for formal reasons. The original decision was an immediate decision based on the idea an immediate reaction is required before final judgement takes place. This final judgement has not taken place. The immediate decision was opposed and for formal reasons the judge agreed that immediate action is not required. Final judgement in the case itself will take place some time later this year. The jury has indicated, that in the case itself it may eventually violates the law. But this is only in indication until final judgement takes place. |
|