Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Someone1234 4294 days ago
A Macbook running Parallels Desktop with Windows works well. You lose SOME battery life but nothing unusual for the workload (they also support basic 3D acceleration for Windows clients).

A Macbook running Windows via Bootcamp is horrifyingly terrible. Neither Microsoft or Apple support it (Apple direct you to Microsoft, Microsoft direct you to Apple), it often breaks (if Windows works on Bootcamp you won the version lottery, although running older versions of Windows on newer Boot Camp can help (e.g. if you installed Windows 8.1 when it first got released you're SOL, even Windows 8 wasn't supported by Boot Camp for almost a year after release!)).

Plus the Windows Macbook drivers are simply terrible. They're the iTunes of drivers. Want your battery life cut by 2/3? You got it. Have a model with both an Intel 2D and Nvidia 3D graphics setup that is meant to switch? Not supported in Windows, Nvidia 100% of the time, also causes the Macbook to overheat as the Nvidia 3D graphics run at almost max (which further destroys your battery life!).

I really cannot bad mouth Boot Camp enough. Simply a terrible experience through and through. There's nothing redeeming about it, even Apple's "geniuses" recommend using Parallels Desktop instead(!). When Apple's own people are saying it isn't worth the headaches and hassle, you know it is bad...

OS X is a wonderful OS frankly. You could do much worse than to buy a Macbook, use OS X, and use a few Windows applications rarely via Parallels Desktop. A lot of people do that, it works great. But mark my words, Boot Camp is shit, Apple doesn't care and hasn't cared for years and years, and they don't "really" support it.

Thinkpads (not Ideapads, ick) would be my call for best PC laptop right now. The T540 is a safe choice. But they have a variety of form factors to choose from.

4 comments

Thank you for sharing. As an owner of a 2013 MBP (8GB RAM, 256GB SSD), I'm wondering what kind of specs are recommended for good performance with Parallels Desktop? I'm looking to be able to do development (e.g. Visual Studio).
Visual Studio can be a beast, and it will eat whatever you give it. Those specs (4 GB for OS X, 4 GB for Windows/VS) should work, but I'd say 16 GB is "ideal."

Having an SSD will help as swap can be utilised to make up for any deficiencies you might see with RAM. Although expect slightly longer loading times than you're used to running on bare metal.

+1 On the Thinkpads, never really looked at them before. I like how you can customize the specs a lot.
What about VMware Fusion? Is it pretty much the equivalent of Parallels?
Thanks for sharing this! Very informative.