|
|
|
|
|
by breakall
4289 days ago
|
|
Thanks for sharing your story. You might have guessed -- your local librarian was not unique in her feelings about privacy.
I worked for my county library all through high school and college. When I started they had an ancient mainframe circulation system, and was there when they migrated to a newer java based system. With both systems, it was a paramount requirement that records of a patron (library term for customer) checking out a book be destroyed irretrievably after the book was returned. Even in the case of overdue item resulting in a fine, after the fine was paid, no record of the circulation or even what the fine was paid for was kept. Slips of paper printed with patrons' names and phone numbers when they put items on hold were dutifully shredded every day.
At one point during school, I considered the library as a profession, and as part of my research I subscribed to a "technology in libraries" listserv, and followed it for about a year. This was soon after 9/11 and the advent of the Patriot Act, when the most pernicious implications were that the feds could look at library circulation records. (Little did we know!) Many libraries were proud that their technology specifically prevented this. There was also a constant and ongoing philosophical conversation about how to make more information freely available, and make access to it (including Internet access) anonymous, and further to resist efforts by law enforcement to use libraries to gather information on their patrons or regulate access.
I cannot think of an institution that defends the freedoms of thought and expression more passionately than the public library. |
|
The library didn't switch to a computerized circulation system until after she retired.