|
|
|
|
|
by dredmorbius
4291 days ago
|
|
To be fair: the case described here is two magnitudes larger in both directions than your use case. And the critical aspect from a performance perspective was where the hash table became too large to fit into memory. Performance of all sorts goes pear-shaped when that happens. rsync is pretty incredible, but, well, quantity has a quality all its own, and the scale involved here (plus the possible in-process disk failure) likely wasn't helping much. |
|