|
|
|
|
|
by antocv
4296 days ago
|
|
Yes, exactly, we can make translations of symbols so that it is actually easier for human readers to decode the meaning and message of the symbols. Perhaps we could even reuse previous symbols and meanings to convey what we want to convey instead of offering ambiguity. I just wonder, who would have thought of such an idea. That is genious. And something that has completely evaded Rust designers. |
|
You do. The symbol is given meaning by context.
> who would have thought of such an idea.
That would be me.
> genius
Weed, caffeine, and sleep deprivation. Staring at Harris mainframe assembly language core dumps on reams of green bar paper... does things to a man. ;-)
HTML5 and Unicode are wonderful toys. Go play. My notes and early efforts on this go back to 1979. Anyone is welcome to them. It does take quite a bit of effort to transmit, so patience is a virtue here.
(P.S. Don't overlook color.)
(P.P.S. Or animation.)
---
Edit: You'd be surprised how easy input becomes. It removes a huge mental load from context switching (e.g. hitting the same button to get Control F4, Control W, Apple W, Alt F Alt C, etc.).
Use a few touchpads which can change the symbols based on current context, and baby - you got a stew goin'.
Take care.