[jjoonathan]

> Nothing prevents [disrupting google] but the lack of people willing and able to do it.

Nothing prevents people leaping over skyscrapers in a single bound except the lack of people able to do it.

[staunch]

Exactly right. We're just a few years and a new kind of exoskeleton product away from able to leap skyscrapers if we want to. Materials science, computing, and battery technology are getting there. Someone will just have to actually make it. Good example.

[ericd]

And the changes in biology necessary to resist the acceleration required to impart that much kinetic energy on the body in the amount of time that you're in contact with the ground?

[icebraining]

Jumping from airplanes didn't require any changes to biology, even with much greater falls.

[philh]

I believe ericd is talking about the ascent, not the descent.

If you want to jump over a building, you need to depart the ground at the same speed as you'll hit it on the way down (more, because of air resistance). The forces applied to your body are just as lethal in both directions.

(This specifically applies to jumping, where all your acceleration comes at the beginning of the journey. Jetpacks, planes, etc. get around the problem by letting you accelerate while in midair.)

[icebraining]

If you want to jump over a building, you need to depart the ground at the same speed as you'll hit it on the way down

Well, the horizontal speed can be gained more slowly (running before the jump). Only the vertical speed needs immediate acceleration.

[ericd]

Yeah, it's just that the vertical is much more than enough to kill you (more than the energy from jumping off the top of the building), so the horizontal is kind of irrelevant.

[ericd]

Yep, thanks for clarifying, I was talking about the jumping portion.