|
|
|
|
|
by ogrisel
4307 days ago
|
|
> does not need labeled data It needed training on 1TB of labeled images in the first place. Arguably it can be used to transfer that knowledge to other tasks with a much smaller amount of labeled samples but still requires supervision. |
|
If the error rate gets low enough, a NN could start labeling pics.
Finally, recent work has shown that running a dictionary through an image search engine can yield high quality labeled images automatically.
Aside: Thank you for contributing to sklearn. Really feel like I am standing on the shoulders of giants when I use that library.