Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rjbwork 4296 days ago
Ironically this mindset contributed to them going under. Not criticizing you, just a funny observation.
3 comments

I'd like to think that charging £200 for a device that has little better use case than being cute and quirky played a part as well.

Especially considering that you can buy a professional POS thermal receipt printer for the same price for any viable projects requiring printing in that general form factor.

They were a leading speculative design studio, not another manufacturer of printers. Coming from a different place, more similar to how sci-fi stokes the fires. I'm shocked and sad that they went under given that they had been doing consulting for years. I wonder how taking VC last year affected this.

But not shocked that Little Printer or the Berg Cloud was commercially unsuccessful. Perhaps they just bet a little too much thinking that their excellent design and particular approach would translate to enough value for enough people.

It's the mindset that created the thing in the first place that caused it to go under.
A mindset, and growing recognition that startups are failure prone or targets of acqui-hire-and-shutdown. Disposable product-services are only good for those betting on the next (first/only?) quarterly earnings report.