[sanchitml]

Gathering aggregated and anonymized 'doesnot' hamper privacy.

If we look at any authentic reference (Ex: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Analytics#Privacy_issues) we will find only when an app associates behaviour-analytics with attributes such as IP Addresses and Geolocation data, it may debate privacy issues, otherwise not.

If you see the word 'privacy', it only activates when an individual is being talked about. There are no specific users on this app, no email id, no unique id. All requests are considered similar irrespective of origin.

[tokenizerrr]

Look, you're welcome to think what you think, but I've read the source code of your app and I am not comfortable using it, so I won't. Furthermore Google Analytics has access to the user's IP address, and even though it may not display it to you, Google still gets that information.

As for your claim of "no unique id", this is simply false. Google Analytics keeps track of an unique id for each user, they can tell you the count of unique visitors after all.

When you're boasting about privacy, do not track your users. What else are you meaning to imply with "privacy"? That the notes are not being sent to your server? Well, I goddamn hope so. Is there anything that makes your app more private than any other?

[eps]

> Gathering aggregated and anonymized 'doesnot' hamper privacy.

To put it bluntly, I don't give a flying f%ck about this. You said "private" and then your app phoned home behind my back - you outright lied to me. There's one definition of privacy, doubly so for people who actually care about it, and it doesn't come with weasel caveats like yours. So that one star you got is wholly justified and you should really listen to what people here are telling you, because that's exactly the feedback you are not getting from people giving you 1 star in the Chrome store.

In the end it's all really simple - either remove analytics from the app or remove "private" from its description.