|
|
|
|
|
by fensterbrett
4309 days ago
|
|
> If cognition is embodied, that raises problems for artificial intelligence. Since computers don’t have bodies, let alone sensations, what are the implications of these findings for their becoming conscious—that is, achieving strong AI? Lakoff is uncompromising: "It kills it." Of Ray Kurzweil’s singularity thesis, he says, "I don’t believe it for a second." Computers can run models of neural processes, he says, but absent bodily experience, those models will never actually be conscious. Well, then let's simulate the body as well once we got the brain right. |
|
What a lack of human embodiement prevents in AI is strong communication with humans. Why ? Because as Lakoff hinted on, they'll lack grasp on the linguistic twists and metaphors that make our language relate to our everyday experiences. The problem will be similar to the problem we would have trying to communicate with a bird or an insect. We don't ground our communication in the same things at all.