|
|
|
|
|
|
by curtis17
4305 days ago
|
|
|
The most interesting way forward re languages/runtimes looks like something Brendan mentioned here:
http://javascriptjabber.com/124-jsj-the-origin-of-javascript... > At some point, Sweet.js ties the knot and people can write hygienic macros and extend the language.... And it’s all based on a common set of primitives and that’s the important thing. You can reason about the primitives. You can compose them. They’re compositional. They compose orthogonally. That’s the goal here. JavaScript has a lot of warts in it, but if you weed those out or deprecate them you end up with stuff that is compositional. And that’s where I think we’re heading. |
|
|
Odersky: That's going to be a more fundamental rethink of what Scala is. The main goal is to make it simpler, to review it or work out what its core is, and have a very simple core on which essentially the other features of Scala can all be based. Essentially, it's a way to modularize the language better, to base the features that we know from Scala on a very, very simple core that we can compile efficiently and reason precisely about. That's the main goals for Don Giovanni.
http://www.infoworld.com/t/java-programming/scala-founder-la...