|
|
|
|
|
by coldtea
4315 days ago
|
|
First, that's not porn. In the worst case, it's "glamour models" (could also be regular models). Second, we "objectify mens/females bodies" all the time. It just means that we treat them as something nice to look at. That's 90% of Hollywood, pop music, advertisements, and tons of everyday interactions. An art nude, by Picasso or whoever, it's exactly that too. This guy is not involved in sex trafficking or anything. He just likes how professional models, people paid to be photographed and wishing for a successful career in modeling photography, look on photographs. Also, from my experience with similar discussions: if he had gay models on the monitors, nobody that speaks of "objectification" would have said anything. Some (stupid) people might have made fun of him for the gay pictures, but champions of non-objectification would not have mentioned anything about objectification. |
|