|
|
|
|
|
by kristiandupont
4312 days ago
|
|
What do you mean you could write 10 lines of scheme where there would have to write a whole new executable? Did you have some really applicable template or something, or are you just implying that Scheme is vastly more productive than C? |
|
My process was: get their client installed, poke around in repl until I was confident I could find it and all its friends, write a function to clobber all of that, then iterate if needed. Where they would have to edit/recompile/run, I would just do a new thing in a repl. Then, too, my code was shorter, mostly from scheme vs. c and partly because I had better libraries than they did.