|
|
|
|
|
by csmdev
4304 days ago
|
|
Sounds become annoying with time. But visual cues are often automated and ignored. This is why the current solution works best. Because of the way we evolved, a sound automatically makes our brain alert. At first it's ok. But with time we learn that there is no actual danger. And the sound only becomes annoying. Making us alert for nothing. Visual cues are treated differently. If something is deemed safe or accepted by the brain, you automatically start ignoring it and focus on something else. So an acknowledgement comes only when something is different. And even then, we simply notice it. It's not an actual alert like sound is. So the idea is bad. It goes against the way our brains work. |
|
The brain can push sounds to the background in the same way it does with visual cues, if there's no danger associated with them. For instance, you're not annoyed by the sounds your keyboard makes when you type (and I know many developers, who prefer loud, mechanical keyboards).
Also, try the following experiment: open a window during the day, plug in a microphone and just record with it for a minute. When you play it back, you'll hear many sounds your brain learned to ignore - cars passing by, hum of your computer, kids playing soccer on a field nearby, etc.
For those reasons I think there might be a set of sounds that would not become annoying with time.