|
|
|
|
|
|
by mtrimpe
4318 days ago
|
|
|
Isn't the OP referring to what happens after the 'lifespan' of this processor? I'm still happily running a Mac Pro I maxxed out in 2008 and expect a couple more years out of it at the least. It would be nice if this kind of machine could last a similar 6-8 years instead of entering (and I think that was the OPs point) 'engineered' obsolescence in 4/5 years? |
|
|
No, he's reffering to what will happen in "2 years". I quote: "But in two years, swapping in 128gb would be the no-brainer upgrade to this thing. That this is being ruled out ahead of time is not a good thing".
And there's just no way that normal users will run their desktop apps in VMs in two years -- which is what was said a as a justification for needing > 64gb.